As a household skincare device, the price of a beauty device is influenced by factors such as the type of technology, brand positioning, and functional configuration, resulting in significant differences. The following analyzes the price composition and selection points based on mainstream product types and market data.
The price range of home beauty devices is wide, mainly divided into three levels: entry-level, mid-range, and high-end. For example, entry-level products are approximately between 2,000 – 3,000 yuan, usually integrating basic technologies such as radiofrequency and microcurrent, suitable for daily maintenance; mid-range models are approximately between 4,000 – 5,000 yuan, enhancing energy output and zone care, addressing anti-aging needs; high-end devices may integrate multimodal technologies, with prices reaching over 10,000 yuan, but note that some materials mix professional-grade photonic skin rejuvenation devices, priced between 3,000 – 20,000 yuan, with the same price range as home beauty devices. Home devices focus more on safety and convenience, while professional devices need to be operated in medical institutions.

TAGS: HOME RF BEAUTY DEVICE, HOME RF BEAUTY EQUIPMENT, HOME RF BEAUTY MACHINE, RF BEAUTY DEVICE, RF BEAUTY EQUIPMENT, RF BEAUTY MACHINE
The reason for such a large price difference in facial beauty devices lies in the different technical content and functional configuration.
Radiofrequency beauty devices stimulate collagen regeneration through energy, and the price is related to the number of electrodes and the uniformity of the heat field. A 12-electrode design beauty device improves efficiency, while some beauty devices’ “radiofrequency + red light + microcurrent” triple output increases costs; brand premium is also significant, such as iCHARM, as an industry standard setter, its R&D investment is reflected in the pricing.
When choosing, it is necessary to combine personal needs and budget.
For users aged 25 – 30, entry-level devices can maintain skin firmness; users over 30 may prefer mid-range models to cope with collagen loss. It is recommended to prioritize models with clinical data support and safe operation, and refer to the medical device registration information from official channels.